This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Thoracic Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Eddie L. Hoover, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:1296.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This review article by Targarona et al is a meta-analysis of reports using mesh in complex paraesophageal and mixed hiatal hernias, with recurrence being the end point. Therein lies my first concern with this article. This complex disorder is more than recurrences and mesh erosion. A review article should cover all important parameters, which, in this case, include postoperative dysphagia (10%), gas bloating (8%), patient satisfaction, nausea, early satiety, and the recurrence of symptoms absent recurrent hernia, since half of these patients have resumed taking antireflux medications within 3 to 5 years after surgery. I am also troubled by 2 other observations: first, the authors do not present any data from their own experience, and second, none of the 4 coauthors is credited with a single publication in the 112 citations in the bibliography. I personally feel that credibility is an issue with review articles, because . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2004;139(12):1275.
FULL TEXT  

Mesh in the Hiatus: A Controversial Issue
Eduardo M. Targarona, Gali Bendahan, Carmen Balague, Jordi Garriga, and Manuel Trias
Arch Surg. 2004;139(12):1286-1296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT