You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 10, October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Wrong-Site Surgery

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The scholarly article by Kwaan et al1 brings much-needed attention to the ongoing problem of wrong-site surgery. However, the manner in which this article has been used in the public domain raises serious concerns about the message we are sending to the public, to health care providers, and to health care administrative personnel. As the Chairman of Surgery at a large community hospital and a recognized expert in surgery site mark safety, I believe we have only scratched the surface of this important issue. No informed-consent document lists operating on the wrong body part as an accepted risk of surgery. We need to embrace the issue of wrong-site surgery and recognize that the present strategies have been ineffective. Consider the following:

  1. Public debate as to the frequency of wrong-site surgery errors has sent the wrong message to patients. Specifically, this debate implies that the importance to physicians of eliminating wrong-site . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Glenn Rothman, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Wrong-Site Surgery—Reply
Mary R. Kwaan, David Studdert, Michael J. Zinner, and Atul A. Gawande
Arch Surg. 2006;141(10):1050.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence, Patterns, and Prevention of Wrong-Site Surgery
Mary R. Kwaan, David M. Studdert, Michael J. Zinner, and Atul A. Gawande
Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):353-358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Wrong-Site and Wrong-Patient Procedures in the Universal Protocol Era: Analysis of a Prospective Database of Physician Self-reported Occurrences
Stahel et al.
Arch Surg 2010;145:978-984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.