 |
|
Failure of a Web-Based Educational Tool to Improve Residents' Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination—Invited Critique
John Tarpley, MD;
Margaret Tarpley, MLS
Arch Surg. 2006;141:417.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
The Web-based BeST Resident display at the 2003 Surgical Education Week favorably impressed me until I calculated the cost for our 45 categorical residents at Vanderbilt. Surgery education conferences push investment in simulators, skills laboratories, and software products. Thus, I was relieved by the results of the Massachusetts General Hospital experience with this "educational solution" for new resident duty hours because of personal reservations that Web-based educational products are a magic bullet.
With 9 residents comprising the key finding of this study and only 19 total subjects, the sample size is small and underpowered. The authors openly admit this shortcoming. A low usage level was noted, in part because of other options such as the technologically challenged textbook. Sadly, the resident who gave it the best effort lost ground in personal ABSITE results.
We agree with the authors' comment that "it is the individual . . . [Full Text of this Article]
AUTHOR INFORMATION
RELATED ARTICLE
Failure of a Web-Based Educational Tool to Improve Residents' Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination
Charles M. Ferguson and Andrew L. Warshaw
Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):414-416.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
