You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 141 No. 7, July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Patient-Physician Communication Using Consent Forms—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We appreciate Dr Goldblatt's thoughtful commentary with which we fully agree. We and Dr Goldblatt believe that surgeons have an important opportunity to convert the consent process from a legalistic exercise, as it is often practiced, into a substantive conversation that accomplishes the education and partnership that are the hallmarks of true shared decision making. We thank Dr Goldblatt for emphasizing the role of the consent form and explaining how altering the timing of its completion can further that goal.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Correspondence: Dr Bernat, Neurology Section, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03756 (bernat@dartmouth.edu).

James L. Bernat, MD; Lynn M. Peterson, MD


RELATED ARTICLE

Patient-Physician Communication Using Consent Forms
David Goldblatt
Arch Surg. 2006;141(7):715.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.