This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Life  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Burns  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Richard L. Gamelli, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(1):57.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Sánchez et al provide us with outcomes data that go beyond hospital cost, length of stay, and morbidity and mortality statistics. They found that labor expenses were the major cost of treating burn patients, pointing out that burn care remains labor intensive. Currently, nearly two thirds of burn centers in the United States are experiencing a nursing shortage, and many have similar problems for burn surgeons. During the past decade, less than 50% of fellows completing burn fellowships have remained active in burn care, and 30% of those who are currently active plan to retire within 5 years. These shortages may become all the more significant by 2020 if the predicted shortages of 400 000 nurses and 200 000 physicians in the United States are correct.

Although using DRGs seems a reasonable approach to classify patients and cost of care, there are flaws inherent in this approach. The . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?