You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 10, October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology, Other
 •Public Health
 •Obesity
 •Bariatric Surgery
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bariatric Surgery in the New Millennium

Edward H. Livingston, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(10):919-922.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This issue of the Archives includes a constellation of articles describing various aspects of bariatric surgery. Just several years ago, very few manuscripts of this type were accepted by conventional surgical journals, a testament to how rapidly surgical practices have changed. Bariatric surgery was not considered acceptable by most until 1991 when the National Institutes of Health convened a consensus panel charged with reviewing the available data and determining what operations may be performed and on what types of patients. The panel's recommendations had substantial impact.1 Their recommendations for bariatric surgery criteria have remained virtually unaltered for the past 16 years.

Even though the field was opened up in 1991, another decade passed before the operations were performed in significant numbers. Obesity, like smoking, is widely perceived to result from a patient's habits and not from some organic disorder. Consequently, insurance companies had been successful in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass May Not Increase Patients’ Return to Work
Carl L. Tishler and Natalie Staats Reiss
Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):1024-1025.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass May Not Increase Patients’ Return to Work—Reply
Edward H. Livingston
Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):1025.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass May Not Increase Patients' Return to Work
Tishler and Reiss
Arch Surg 2008;143:1024-1025.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.