You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 5, May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Law and Medicine
 •Pain
 •Pediatric Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Misinterpretation of the Fifth Vital Sign

Robert A. Kozol, MD; Anthony Voytovich, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):417-419.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The traditional quartet of vital signs (pulse, blood pressure, temperature, and respiration) has always played a prominent role in the diagnostic armamentarium and remains, appropriately, at the head of the written or verbally presented physical examination. The earliest manifestations of infection, sepsis, occult bleeding, and cardiopulmonary dysfunction often become apparent when looking at the vital signs. In the case of a patient with a high spinal cord injury and autonomic dysreflexia, profound hypertension and bradycardia may be the only clue to a medical or surgical crisis that otherwise remains silent because of interrupted pain pathways.

Despite their value, these trusted measurements have always had their pitfalls and limitations. Blood pressure readings can be misleading because of measurement variation and error inherent in improper cuff width, auscultatory gap (the silent phases between systolic and diastolic determinations), and even the auditory acuity of the listener, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Pain as the Fifth Vital Sign
Paul Rousseau
Arch Surg. 2008;143(1):98.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pain Assessment Is Vital
Betty Ferrell
Arch Surg. 2008;143(1):98-99.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pain Assessment Is Vital—Reply
Robert Kozol and Anthony Voytovich
Arch Surg. 2008;143(1):99.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Misinterpretation of the Fifth Vital Sign—Invited Critique
Edward H. Livingston
Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):419-420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pain as the Fifth Vital Sign
Rousseau
Arch Surg 2008;143:98-98.
FULL TEXT  

Pain Assessment Is Vital
Ferrell
Arch Surg 2008;143:98-99.
FULL TEXT  

The Role of Opioids in Pain Management
White and Kehlet
Anesth. Analg. 2007;105:1866-1866.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.