This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Pain  • Surgery  • Surgery, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Paul Rousseau, MD

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I read with interest the commentaries on pain as the fifth vital sign by Drs Kozol, Voytovich, and Livingston in the May issue of the Archives.^1-2 Although their subjective comments regarding the adverse consequences of pain as a fifth vital sign are bolstered by referenced studies, they fail to address one of the primary reasons for unfavorable outcomes in the arena of pain management: a lack of education among physicians regarding pain management principles and analgesic pharmacology. Dr Livingston makes the point best when he describes the litigation of an 85-year-old elderly gentleman with pulmonary compromise who suffered a respiratory arrest in the emergency department after receiving morphine (I wonder what dose of morphine he received and whether he was opioid naive) but was then admitted and variously prescribed a fentanyl citrate patch, meperidine, and acetaminophen/hydrocodone. Although the chronological use of these medications is not indicated, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Misinterpretation of the Fifth Vital Sign
Robert A. Kozol and Anthony Voytovich
Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):417-419.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT