You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last

Aisling M. Hogan, MD; Desmond C. Winter, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dr Ricciardi and colleagues1 are to be congratulated on their enquiry into the true relationship between volume and outcome. In addition to providing a concise synopsis of recent changes in cardiothoracic practice, they explore the impact of specific-procedure volume on in-hospital mortality (an indisputably robust end point). Considering that most studies to date have been intrinsically flawed,2 the present article adds evidence and equipoise to an otherwise misleading knowledge base. It congratulates smaller hospitals (a refreshing sentiment in an era of centralization) and recognizes their contribution to global surgical care. The authors understand the limitations of using volume as a sole base of comparison and allude to the fact that surgeon lifetime experience may be more important than current hospital throughput. This was highlighted by a minimal change in outcome when a hospital shifted from the high- to low-volume group, an angle . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Volume-Outcome Relationship for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in an Era of Decreasing Volume
Rocco Ricciardi, Beth A. Virnig, James W. Ogilvie, Jr, Peter S. Dahlberg, Harry P. Selker, and Nancy N. Baxter
Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):338-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last—Reply
Rocco Ricciardi and Nancy N. Baxter
Arch Surg. 2008;143(12):1235.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.