 |
 |

E-mail Access and Improved Communication Between Patient and Surgeon—Invited Critique
David S. Mulder, MD
Arch Surg. 2008;143(2):168-169.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Advances in medical communication technology have developed at a rapid pace and include telemedicine, the electronic medical record, and e-mail. The application in banking and other retail industries has been explosive and revolutionary. The ambitious predictions for a role in clinical medicine have not been realized and have been poorly studied in terms of benefits, particularly related to quality of care.
Stalberg and colleagues have carried out a prospective randomized study assessing e-mail as a device to improve communication between patient and surgeon. The study group is unique in that all were patients of a single surgeon and all had e-mail potential at home or work. (A clear reflection of the age group involved!) Patients were having a thyroid or parathyroid procedure, with a short hospital stay and what I would consider an excellent informed consent in both groups.
Perioperative communication with the surgeon was initiated . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
RELATED ARTICLE
E-mail Access and Improved Communication Between Patient and Surgeon
Peter Stalberg, Michael Yeh, Geraldine Ketteridge, Hilary Delbridge, and Leigh Delbridge
Arch Surg. 2008;143(2):164-168.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|