You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Invited Critique
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Surgical Physiology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

To Mesh or Not to Mesh, That Is the Question

Comment on "Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy"

William G. Hawkins, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):899.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Yamamoto and colleagues are to be congratulated on the third and, thus far, the largest single-institution series examining the addition of a buttress to reinforce a stapled distal pancreatic transection. I, along with my colleagues, have also presented a case series on this subject,1 and, like my own, the article by Yamamoto et al has a number of significant shortcomings that prevent a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of buttressing.

In this series, the authors interpret their data to suggest that the use of Seamguard to reinforce a stapler likely reduces the incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure. The major weakness of their conclusion stems from the fact that this is a retrospective review of nonstandardized techniques used at the surgeon's discretion. The possibility that these results represent nothing more than accidental selection of a favorable patient group should be strongly considered. An example of how surgeon . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy
Maki Yamamoto, Michael S. Hayashi, Ninh T. Nguyen, Thang D. Nguyen, Scott McCloud, and David K. Imagawa
Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):894-899.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.