 |
 |

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma—Invited Critique
Christopher L. Wolfgang, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2009;144(2):148.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Numerous reports have documented the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for select patients. As the assessment of this approach matures, medium- and long-term outcomes have begun to reach the level of publication. Consistent with other recent work,1-3 Lai and coworkers demonstrate a midterm survival comparable to that of the open technique. These results support the ability of minimal-access surgery to be performed in an oncologically sound manner for the resection of primary HCC.
A perception exists that minimal-access surgery is superior to the open technique with regard to recovery, earlier discharge, and a more rapid return to daily activities. Indeed, this has been shown to be the case for certain other laparoscopic operations.4 Whether this applies to a complex procedure such as a hepatectomy is unclear. Lai and coworkers report a statistically significant 2-day earlier discharge in their minimal-access group compared with retrospectively . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ten-Year Experience in a Single Center
Eric C. H. Lai, Chung Ngai Tang, Joe P. Y. Ha, and Michael K. W. Li
Arch Surg. 2009;144(2):143-147.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|