This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology, Other  • Endocrine Surgery  • Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery  • Surgical Oncology  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Richard A. Prinz, MD; G. Scott Smith, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):259.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The indications for adrenalectomy were developed before the introduction of laparoscopy. Tumors larger than 5 cm, tumors between 3 and 5 cm with worrisome features or in young patients who would require prolonged follow-up, and functioning tumors are generally accepted reasons to recommend adrenalectomy. In this article, Henneman and others reviewed their 20-year experience with adrenal surgery to determine whether the indications for operation have changed with the introduction of LA at their center. They conclude that the indications for surgery have remained constant during the study period. However, the authors note a dramatic increase in the number of adrenalectomies performed, from 66 cases to 203 cases after the introduction of LA. The laparoscopic era was further divided into 5-year intervals. An increase from 81 cases in the first 5-year period to 122 cases in the latter period was noted. The authors state . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy
Daniel Henneman, Yuchiao Chang, Richard A. Hodin, and David L. Berger
Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):255-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT