You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 5, May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

New World of Patient Safety

23rd Annual Samuel Jason Mixter Lecture

Lucian L. Leape, MD

Arch Surg. 2009;144(5):394-398.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

Most physicians think of progress in surgery—medical progress in general—as scientific progress. The great flowering of medicine in the last half of the 20th century was one of the greatest triumphs of science of all time. We developed progressively—and impressively—better treatments, medical and surgical, because we continually expanded our understanding of diseases, and we were incredibly innovative.

Using the scientific method of hypothesis generation, experimental design, and collection and analysis of data, we developed new operations, new devices, and new drugs. And, particularly in surgery, the results were truly awesome. Millions upon millions of patients have had their pain relieved, their health restored, and their lives extended because of the brilliant advances that occurred just in the lifetimes of many of us here today. This all came from exactly the kinds of studies we have heard about during this meeting the past 2 days.

But starting . . . [Full Text of this Article]

WHAT WE KNOW

WHAT WE DO

Which Brings Us to the Other Half of What We Do: How?

Case in Point: Central Line Infections

WHAT WE ARE

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliations: Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Brij B. Agarwal
Arch Surg. 2009;144(10):979.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Agarwal
Arch Surg 2009;144:979-979.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy--Reply
Ishizawa et al.
Arch Surg 2009;144:979-979.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.