You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Should We Not Strive for a Balance Between Procedure Fee and Overall Cost?

Susan Galandiuk, MD; Dora Allen, CPC

Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):496-497.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The subtle and not-so-subtle influence of industry on physicians has lately become a front-burner issue. Device makers and surgeons are coming under ever greater scrutiny. Although ventral, incisional, or inguinal hernia repair, with or without prosthetic material, is a fairly routine procedure, it is in fact one of the areas in need of greatest reassessment, in substantial part because of the massive associated hospital cost. For example, a 16 x 20–cm biologic product can cost up to $10 099! The cost of such a product alone, in this instance, is more than 5 times what the most highly reimbursed surgeon receives for all of his or her care including preoperative assessment, surgery, postoperative care, and office follow-up; further, it is 10 times what America's average surgeon receives for the same effort!

Think further. The durability of such nonpermanent material is highly questionable, and the likelihood . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medication Costs Matter
Morse
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:929-931.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.