 |
 |

Should We Not Strive for a Balance Between Procedure Fee and Overall Cost?
Susan Galandiuk, MD;
Dora Allen, CPC
Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):496-497.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The subtle and not-so-subtle influence of industry on physicians has lately become a front-burner issue. Device makers and surgeons are coming under ever greater scrutiny. Although ventral, incisional, or inguinal hernia repair, with or without prosthetic material, is a fairly routine procedure, it is in fact one of the areas in need of greatest reassessment, in substantial part because of the massive associated hospital cost. For example, a 16 x 20–cm biologic product can cost up to $10 099! The cost of such a product alone, in this instance, is more than 5 times what the most highly reimbursed surgeon receives for all of his or her care including preoperative assessment, surgery, postoperative care, and office follow-up; further, it is 10 times what America's average surgeon receives for the same effort!
Think further. The durability of such nonpermanent material is highly questionable, and the likelihood . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Medication Costs Matter
Morse
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:929-931.
FULL TEXT
|