 |
|
A Reliable Method for Isolation of Viable Porcine Islet Cells
C. Denise Ching, MD;
Robert C. Harland, MD;
Bradley H. Collins, MD;
William Kendall, MD;
Hasan Hobbs, BS;
Emmanuel C. Opara, PhD
Arch Surg. 2001;136:276-279.
ABSTRACT
| |
Hypothesis Mechanical injury and oxidative stress caused by reoxygenation of isolated porcine islet cells result in their unresponsiveness to glucose stimulation.
Design Adult pigs (weighing 25-30 kg) were anesthetized, and following intra-arterial infusion of ice-cold University of Wisconsin solution, a complete pancreatectomy was performed. The pancreatic duct was cannulated for infusion of digestion medium containing collagenase type P, 1.5 mg/mL; deoxyribonuclease I, 10 000 U; and a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E (Trolox), 1 mmol/L. After 20-minute incubations on ice, and at 37°C, the pancreas was hand shaken for 1 minute, followed by filtration and separation on an automatic cell separator (COBE 2991). Islet cells, identified by dithizone staining, were perifused at 37°C.
Results The mean ± SEM yield of intact purified islet cells (50-200 µm in diameter), and mostly present in clusters, was 2398 ± 143 cells per gram (n = 12). Glucose stimulation caused a significant increase in biphasic insulin secretion in the perifusion experiments.
Conclusion We have developed a simple, reproducible, and reliable procedure for isolating intact and viable porcine islet cells suitable for xenotransplantation.
INTRODUCTION
DIABETES mellitus is an enormous drain on the economy, as its management constitutes a large proportion of health care expenditures in the United States.1 A significant amount of the expenditures on diabetes results from the treatment of its secondary complications. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial showed that the development of diabetic complications and their progression can be significantly slowed by strict glycemic control during intensive insulin therapy.2 However, it is stressful and difficult to achieve glycemic control by the methods of intensive insulin therapy used in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Moreover, intensive insulin administration imposes a significant danger of hypoglycemia and unwanted weight gain to patients receiving the treatment.2-3 A better degree of glycemic control, than was seen in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, has been observed in diabetic patients who received islet transplants,4 without the adverse hypoglycemic episodes associated with intensive insulin therapy. Furthermore, in contrast to intensive insulin therapy, islet transplantation can prevent the development of diabetic complications because of the role played by C-peptide, a by-product of insulin processing.5 Hence, biological replacement of destroyed or functionally impaired  cells with normal islet transplants remains the best option to achieve glycemic control and prevent the development of disabling complications.4-9 Still, there are major obstacles to routine use of islet transplants as a treatment option. These include the shortage of pancreas from human donors and the need to prevent transplant rejection by the use of immunosuppressive drugs, which are often toxic to cells and cause other adverse effects in transplant recipients.6-7,10 The ultimate goal in transplantation is the unlimited availability of organs or tissues to be transplanted in a simple procedure that requires no use of immunosuppressive drugs.
For decades, patients with diabetes have been treated with porcine insulin, and the pig is regarded as the ideal source of islet cells for clinical xenotransplantation.11-12 However, isolation of intact and viable porcine islet cells has become an enigma because of their highly fragile nature. Methods for the isolation of porcine islet cells are semiautomatic procedures that require specially designed isolation chambers, and involve collagenase digestion with mechanical disruption of pancreatic tissue.13-16 These procedures are usually performed with either recirculation or continuous agitation of the digestion medium, and result in significant fragmentation of the harvested porcine islet cells. Consequently, the islet cells often have poor response to glucose stimulation.14, 17 Moreover, the need to use special isolation chambers and accessories, which are not readily available, is a source of frustration for investigators who would like to use the semiautomated procedure for isolation of porcine islet cells. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop simple and reliable procedures for the isolation of intact and viable porcine islet cells that would be easily adaptable in a basic research laboratory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The protocol used for this study was approved by the Animal Care Committee, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Young adult male Yorkshire pigs (weighing 25-30 kg) were purchased from a local breeder (Shenise and Sons, Henderson, NC). Collagenase type P and deoxyribonuclease I were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind. Crystalline pork insulin was a gift, and monoiodinated iodine I 125 was obtained from New England Nuclear, Boston, Mass. RPMI 1640 medium was obtained from GIBCO Co, Grand Island, NY. Pig serum was procured from the Duke University Medical Center Culture Facility. A water-soluble analogue of vitamin E (Trolox) was obtained from Aldrich Chemicals, Milwaukee, Wis. Hanks balanced salt solution, antibiotics, highly purified bovine serum albumin (fraction 5), and all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corp, St Louis, Mo.
SURGERY AND ISOLATION OF PORCINE ISLET CELLS
The pigs were anesthetized with isoflurane. Following intra-arterial infusion of ice-cold University of Wisconsin solution, a complete pancreatectomy was performed with sterile techniques. The pancreas was weighed and placed in a dish for cannulation of the pancreatic duct and infusion of digestion medium, comprising Hanks balanced salt solution containing collagenase type P, 1.5 mg/mL; deoxyribonuclease I, 10 000 U; and a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E, 1 mmol/L. After 20 minutes of incubation on ice, the pancreas was incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes before being hand shaken for 1 minute in the covered dish. The digested tissue was filtered using a nylon mesh with a pore size of 1000 µm, and the islet cells were purified on a discontinuous iso-osmolar Ficoll gradient using an automatic cell separator (COBE 2991). The islet cells were then washed in Hanks balanced salt solution and identified by dithizone staining.18 Islet size and numbers were assessed by examining aliquots of islet preparations on an inverted microscope (model CK-40; Olympus Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a digital camera (Pixera Corp, Los Gatos, Calif), and linked to a computer program (UTHSCSA Image Tool for Windows Software; University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio) for determination of the number and size of particles.
CULTURE OF ISOLATED PORCINE ISLET CELLS
Following purification of islet cells, they were placed in sterile culture dishes containing RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 20% pig serum and a 1% mixture of antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin sulfate) before overnight (18-24 hours) culture. The culture dishes were incubated at 37°C, in an atmosphere of humidified 95% air and 5% carbon dioxide, as previously described.19
GLUCOSE STIMULATION OF INSULIN SECRETION
The islet cells were tested either immediately after isolation or following an overnight (18-24 hour) culture in RPMI 1640 medium using a perifusion procedure.19 Islet cells were preperifused at the rate of 1 mL/min for 1 hour at 37°C with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, which was gassed with 95% air–5% carbon dioxide, and maintained at pH 7.4. The Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer contained 1% purified albumin and basal glucose, 3.3 mmol/L (60 mg/dL). Following preperifusion, basal samples were collected at 5-minute intervals for 20 minutes before the glucose concentration in the perifusate was raised to 16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL), and effluent samples were also collected for 30 minutes. The islet cells were finally perifused with the basal glucose perifusate for 20 minutes with sample collection. Solutions were changed using a stopcock system, and all samples collected on ice were stored frozen until radioimmunoassay for insulin.20
DATA ANALYSIS
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and were statistically evaluated using a 1-way analysis of variance computer program (GraphPad, San Diego, Calif) to compare insulin secretion before, during, and after glucose perifusion, 16.7 mmol/L; depending on the outcome of the analysis of variance, the Bonferroni correction was used to assess the significance of difference between the mean rates of insulin secretion. P<.05 was judged to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Typically, the harvested porcine islet cells, measuring between 50 and 200 µm in diameter, were intact and occurred mostly in clusters. Figure 1A shows islet clusters taken immediately after purification, and Figure 1B represents porcine islet cells after an overnight culture. In a series of 12 different preparations, the mean of the following variables was determined:
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Fifty milligrams of dithizone was dissolved in a mixture of 5 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide and 20 mL of absolute ethanol. Following isolation and dithizone staining in a Petri dish, pictures of fresh (A) and overnight cultured (B) porcine islet cells were taken with a digital camera (Pixera Corp, Los Gatos, Calif) attached to an inverted microscope (model CK-40; Olympus Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). After saving the pictures, the images were evaluated for size and numbers of the islet cells.
|
|
|
Glucose stimulation of freshly isolated islet cells caused biphasic insulin secretion, which increased from a mean basal rate of 1415 ± 61 to a peak of 3423 ± 506 pg per 6 islet cells per minute (n = 8) (P<.01) and promptly returned to the basal rate on reduction of glucose to the basal level, as shown in Figure 2. When islet cells were tested after overnight culture, they also had an appropriate response to glucose stimulation (Figure 3), which was comparable to that of freshly isolated islet cells, shown in Figure 2.
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. Freshly isolated porcine islet cells (n = 8) identified by dithizone staining were preperifused at 37°C for 1 hour in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4, containing basal glucose, 3.3 mmol/L (60 mg/dL). After collection of basal effluent samples on ice for the next 20 minutes, the glucose concentration in the perifusate was raised to 16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL), and effluent perifusate was collected during 30 minutes of the high glucose perifusion, before another 20 minutes of basal perifusion with sample collection. The samples were stored frozen until radioimmunoassay for insulin. Data represent mean ± SEM. The asterisk indicates P<.01 vs basal perifusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. The procedure for testing the response of these overnight (18-24 hours) cultured porcine islet cells (n = 6) is as outlined in the legend for Figure 2. Data represent mean ± SEM. The asterisk indicates P<.01 vs basal perifusion.
|
|
|
COMMENT
It is particularly exciting that islet cells harvested with this procedure are predominantly intact, and occur mostly in clusters, thereby obviating the need for measurement of fragments of islet cells for transplantation as islet equivalents. This observation suggests that the avoidance of continuous mechanical agitation during the digestion of pancreatic tissue is necessary to prevent fragmentation of isolated porcine islet cells. In the present study, we have shown that the intact porcine islet cells respond appropriately to changes in glucose concentration. It was previously reported that isolated mouse and porcine islet cells were prone to reoxygenation injury.17, 21 It is well established that hypoxia and reoxygenation, to which isolated islet cells are inherently subjected, cause the generation of toxic-free radicals that impair cellular function.22 Based on these observations, in the present study, we incorporated a chemical antioxidant, a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E in the digestion medium, to provide protection against reoxygenation injury for the isolated islet cells. It is possible that the avoidance of continuous mechanical agitation, combined with the presence of antioxidant in the digestion medium, may be responsible for the appropriate response of freshly isolated porcine islet cells to changes in glucose concentrations in the perifusate.
Islet cells can be stored by culture, which is also a step that precedes storage by cryopreservation of islet cells.23 Although we only examined porcine islet cells after an overnight culture in this study, the observation that porcine islet cells isolated by our procedure also respond appropriately to glucose stimulation after culture suggests that these islet cells may be suitable for storage by culture or cryopreservation, which would diminish their antigenicity.24 Also, in spite of its manual nature, the new procedure we have developed is simple, with an islet cell yield that is comparable to those reported from the semiautomated methods of isolation of porcine islet cells.15-16 In summary, we have developed a simple, reliable, and easily reproducible procedure for the isolation of functionally viable porcine islet cells suitable for routine use in xenotransplantation.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
This study was supported in part by funds from the Lincy Foundation, Beverly Hills, Calif; and Microislet Inc, San Diego, Calif.
Presented in part at the meeting of the International Pancreas and Islet Transplantation Association, Sydney, Australia, August 25, 1999.
We thank Ronald Chance, PhD, Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Ind, for providing the crystalline pork insulin.
Corresponding author and reprints: Emmanuel C. Opara, PhD, Duke University Medical Center, Campus Box 3065, Durham, NC 27710 (e-mail: opara001{at}mc.duke.edu).
From the Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Dr Harland is now with the Division of Transplantation Surgery, UMASS Memorial Health Care, Worcester, Mass.
REFERENCES
| |
1. Rubin RJ, Altman WM, Mendelson DN. Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus, 1992. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:809A-809F.
FULL TEXT
2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.
FREE FULL TEXT
3. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care. 1998;11:567-573.
ABSTRACT
4. Alejandro R, Lehmann R, Ricordi C, et al. Long-term function (6 years) of islet allografts in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 1997;46:1983-1989.
ABSTRACT
5. Ido Y, Vindigni A, Chang K, et al. Prevention of vascular and neuronal dysfunction in diabetic rats by C-peptide. Science. 1997;277:563-566.
FREE FULL TEXT
6. Brunicardi FC, Mullen Y. Issues in clinical islet transplantation. Pancreas. 1994;9:281-290.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
7. Kendall DM, Robertson RP. Pancreas and islet transplantation: challenges for the twenty-first century. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1997;26:611-630.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
8. Weir GC, Bonner-Weir S. Scientific and political impediments to successful islet transplantation. Diabetes. 1997;46:1247-1256.
ABSTRACT
9. Sutherland DER, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RWG. Pancreas transplantation: a review. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:1940-1943.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
10. Ricordi C, Tzakis AG, Carroll PB, et al. Human islet isolation and allotransplantation in 22 consecutive cases. Transplantation. 1992;53:407-414.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
11. Sachs DH. The pig as a potential xenograft donor. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1994;43:185-191.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
12. Vogel G. No moratorium on clinical trials [letter]. Science. 1998;279:648.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Ricordi C, Socci C, Davalli AM, et al. Isolation of the elusive pig islet. Surgery. 1990;107:688-694.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
14. Calafiore R, Calcinaro F, Basta G, et al. A method for massive separation of highly purified adult porcine islets of Langerhans. Metabolism. 1990;39:175-181.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
15. Marchetti P, Giannarelli R, Villani G, et al. Collagenase digestion, two-step sequential filtration, and histopaque gradient purification for consistent isolation of pure pancreatic islets from the market-age (6-month-old) pig. Transplantation. 1994;57:1532-1535.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
16. Brandhorst H, Brandhorst D, Hering BJ, Bretzel RG. Significant progress in porcine islet mass isolation utilizing liberase HI for enzymatic low-temperature pancreas digestion. Transplantation. 1999;68:355-361.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
17. Garfinkel MR, Yadav SS, Harland RC, Hatchell DL, Opara EC. Glutathione potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated porcine islets [abstract]. FASEB J. 1997;11:A436.
18. Fiedor P, Sung RS, Goodman ER, et al. Efficacy and safety of dithizone in staining of islet cell transplants [abstract]. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:2984.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
19. Pitchumoni S, Garfinkel MR, Littman ED, Opara EC. Reoxygenation injury affects isolated islet response to fatty acid stimulation. Metabolism. 1998;47:809-813.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
20. Herbert V, Lau KS, Gottlieb GW. Coated charcoal immunoassay of insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1965;25:1375-1384.
FREE FULL TEXT
21. Littman ED, Opara EC, Akwari OE. Glutathione-mediated preservation and enhancement of isolated perifused islet function. J Surg Res. 1995;59:694-698.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
22. Powell SR, Tortolani AJ. Recent advances in the role of reactive oxygen intermediates in ischemic injury, I: evidence demonstrating presence of reactive oxygen intermediates; II: role of metals in site-specific formation of radicals. J Surg Res. 1992;53:417-429.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
23. Marchetti P, Scharp DW, Pfiffner K, et al. Cryogenic storage of isolated, purified porcine pancreatic islets. Transplantation. 1994;57:340-346.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
24. Miyamoto M, Kenmochi T, Nakagawa Y, et al. Immunogenicity of cryopreserved human islets. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:3406-3408.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
|
