You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Feature
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Image of the Month—Quiz Case

Todd R. Vogel, MD; Jeffrey S. Hammond, MD; Roderich E. Schwarz, MD, PhD
Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick.

Arch Surg. 2005;140:411.

INTRODUCTION

An 18-year-old male college student came to the emergency department with a history of diffuse abdominal pain, diarrhea, and fevers for 2 days. He had not noticed a change in eating habits, abdominal girth, or weight. On examination, vital signs were within normal limits; a firm, nontender mass of 20 cm in diameter was palpated in the left upper abdomen. Aside from a white blood cell count of 13 000/µL, all other hematologic or chemistry laboratory parameters were normal.

Abdominal radiographs showed a normal gas pattern with shifting of the small intestine to the right, combined with a lucency of the left upper quadrant. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a multicystic septated retroperitoneal mass primarily involving the small bowel mesentery, with compression of the distal duodenum (Figure 1A, black arrows). There was displacement of the superior mesenteric artery and vein but no evidence of mesenteric vascular encasement (Figure 1A, white arrows). T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging did reveal a high fluid content within the multicystic mass (Figure 1B).



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. A, Axial computed tomography image of the abdomen. A large, multicystic mass compresses the duodenum (black arrows) and extends to the superior mesenteric artery and vein (white arrows). B, Appearance of the mass on a T2-weighted magnetic resonance image.


Intraoperatively, there was no evidence for metastatic disease; the mesenteric mass did not involve intraperitoneal structures and was readily mobilized. The mass was resected in continuity with a short segment of proximal jejunum, which was found to be attached; superior mesenteric arterial and venous branches were preserved (Figure 2, arrows). The patient had an uneventful recovery and had no recurrence of his symptoms within a year of the operation.



View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Intraoperative picture after dissection of the mass off the superior mesenteric vasculature (arrows).



What Is the Diagnosis?
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •What is the diagnosis?

A. Complex intestinal duplication cyst

B. Multicystic lymphangioma

C. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor

D. Retroperitoneal cysticercosis

Answer

SECTION EDITOR: GRACE S. ROZYCKI, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.