You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 5, May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Feature
 This Article
 •Extract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Computed Tomography
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Image of the Month—Quiz case

Joy Garg, MD; Omid Reza Bakhtar, MD; Sonia Ramamoorthy, MD

Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):487.

INTRODUCTION

A 66-year-old man originally from the Philippines with a history of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis came to our emergency ward with suprapubic pain localizing to the right lower quadrant, a low-grade fever (temperature, 38.1°C), and tachycardia (heart rate, >100 beats/min). Initially, he was minimally communicative and dependent on a gastrostomy tube for his feedings. Given the debilitation from his neurologic disease, a broad workup including laboratory and radiologic studies was initiated. His chemistry panel, urinalysis, and blood culture results were normal. His liver enzyme panel revealed a mildly elevated total bilirubin level of 22 µmol/L (1.3 mg/dL). His white blood cell count was mildly elevated at 10 300 cells/mL. He had a left shift with 83 neutrophils, bandemia (14%), and no eosinophils. His radiologic workup revealed a normal abdominal series. A computed tomographic scan was performed, demonstrating a hyperemic appendix and pericecal fluid without abscess (Figure 1). The patient was taken to the operating room and a routine laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. There was significant periappendiceal fibrosis. The appendix was noted to be purulent and grossly perforated. The appendix was removed successfully. The pathologic analysis of the specimen contained mineralized eggs throughout the appendix (Figure 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. A computed tomographic image of the abdomen showing a hyperemic appendix (arrow) and pericecal fluid without abscess.



Figure 2
View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. The infiltrate consists of plasma cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and rare egg-containing giant cells. The eosinophils commonly seen in acute infections are absent. The eggs (arrow) have inconspicuous spines (paraffin-embedded specimen, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x40).



What Is the Diagnosis?
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •What is the diagnosis?

A. Perforated schistosomal appendicitis

B. Perforated appendiceal cryptosporidiosis

C. Perforated appendiceal cancer

D. Perforated cecal diverticulosis

Answer

Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Drs Garg and Ramamoorthy) and Pathology (Dr Bakhtar), University of California, San Diego.

SECTION EDITOR: GRACE S. ROZYCKI, MD


RELATED ARTICLE

Image of the Month—Diagnosis
Arch Surg. 2007;142(5):488.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.