You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 3, March 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology, Other
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Gene Expression Profiles in Cells of Peripheral Blood to Identify New Molecular Markers of Acute Pancreatitis

Martin Bluth, MD, PhD; Yin-yao Lin, PhD; Hong Zhang, PhD; Domenico Viterbo, PhD; Michael Zenilman, MD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(3):227-233.

ABSTRACT

Hypothesis  Blood leukocytes play a major role in mediating local and systemic inflammation during acute pancreatitis. We hypothesize that peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in circulation exhibit unique changes in gene expression and could provide a "reporter" function that reflects the inflammatory response in the pancreas with acute pancreatitis.

Design  To determine specific changes in blood leukocytes during acute pancreatitis, we studied the gene transcription profile in PBMCs in a rat model of experimental pancreatitis (sodium taurocholate). Normal rats, saline controls, and a model of septic shock were used as a controls. Complementary RNA obtained from PBMCs of each group (n = 3 in each group) were applied to Affymetrix rat genome DNA GeneChip arrays.

Main Outcome Measure  Changes in gene expression.

Results  From the 8799 rat genes analyzed, 140 genes showed unique significant changes in their expression in PBMCs during the acute phase of pancreatitis, but not in sepsis. Among the 140 genes, 57 were up-regulated, while 69 were down-regulated. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor, prostaglandin E2 receptor, and phospholipase D1 were among the top up-regulated genes. Others included genes involved in G protein–coupled receptor and transforming growth factor β–mediated signaling pathways, while genes associated with apoptosis, glucocorticoid receptors, and even the cholecystokinin receptor were down-regulated.

Conclusions  Microarray analysis in transcriptional profiling of PBMCs showed that genes that are uniquely related to molecular and pancreatic function display differential expression in acute pancreatitis. Profiling genes obtained from an easily accessible source during severe pancreatitis may identify surrogate markers for disease severity.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Acute pancreatitis is a severe inflammatory disease frequently diagnosed by acute abdominal pain associated with a concomitant rise of serum amylase and lipase concentrations. There are more than 180 000 new cases per year in the United States.1 While the injury and systemic manifestations are typically mild, up to 20% of the patients will exhibit a severe reaction—typified by pancreatic necrosis—and among them, the morbidity can be more than 80% and mortality, about 25%.2 The pathophysiologic mechanism of the disease includes the activation and release of pancreatic enzymes within the ductal system,3-5 the autodigestion of the pancreas,6 and multiple organ dysfunction following the release of the enzymes into the systemic circulation. A major challenge has been to identify markers of disease severity.

It likely that the synthesis and release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines are responsible for progression of the local injury to the pancreas and retroperitoneum.7 Also, inflammatory mediators produced within the gland increase the pancreatic injury and spread to distant organs,8-10 transforming a local inflammation into a severe systemic disease. The mediators involved in this systemic inflammation are similar to those encountered during sepsis.

Because it is important to predict the severity of the disease as early as possible to optimize the therapy and prevent organ dysfunction and local complications, several scores, such as Ranson criteria, Glasgow Outcome Scale score, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation11-15 score, have been used. New serum markers have emerged and their ability to provide additional information on the severity of the disease has been evaluated.15

The current prognostic indicators available for acute pancreatitis rely heavily on clinical markers combined with an increase in serum levels of proteins such as C-reactive protein and trypsinogen-activation peptide. Newer proteins, such as pancreatitis-associated protein,16 have not reached clinical utility as originally hoped.

Since pancreatitis is an immunologic response to the injury, we explored the possibility that peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) would harbor specific markers of progression of disease. We used gene chip microarray technology to study genetic expression patterns of PBMCs obtained from rats with pancreatitis. While typically one compares these patterns with normal controls, we further compared them with PBMCs obtained from rats with intra-abdominal bacterial sepsis to elucidate unique patterns of expression in acute pancreatitis.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

ANIMALS

All animal experiments in this study were performed with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of State University of New York Downstate Medical Center and in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, Indiana) weighing from 225 to 250 g were used for experiments. Animals were allowed ad libitum exposure to food and water before study and randomly assigned to control or experimental groups.

EXPERIMENTAL ACUTE PANCREATITIS

Acute pancreatitis was induced using retrograde infusion of 4% sodium taurocholate (NaT) (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri) into the pancreatic duct, as previously described.17 Briefly, under pentobarbital anesthesia (50 mg/kg given intraperitoneally; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois), a midline incision was performed. The common bile duct was identified and cannulated in an antegrade direction with PE-10 tubing (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), such that the proximal end of the tube was beyond the ampulla of Vater in the duodenum. The bile duct was then ligated to prevent the flow of bile, and 4% NaT in sterile saline was infused into the pancreatic duct at a rate of 1 mL/kg over 10 minutes.

EXPERIMENTAL SEPTIC SHOCK

Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), as previously described.18 Briefly, under pentobarbital anesthesia, a laparotomy was performed (the size of the incision was 2.5 cm), and the cecum was ligated just below the ileocecal valve with a 3-0 silk ligature and the antimesentric cecal surface was punctured once with a 16-gauge needle proximal to the ligature. The cecum was then returned to the peritoneal cavity and fecal content in the ligated segment was allowed to extrude through the puncture to the peritoneum. The peritoneum and abdominal muscles were closed with silk sutures. After CLP, rats were returned to cages and allowed ad libitum access to food and water. For both the experimental model of acute pancreatitis and sepsis, control rats were anesthetized and sham operated on with a laparotomy. The pancreas or cecum was manipulated but neither pancreatitis induction nor the CLP procedure was performed.

PBMC ISOLATION

Twenty-four hours after pancreatitis, septic shock induction, or sham operation with saline infusion or in untouched, normal control animals who had fasted (n = 3 each group, N = 12), approximately 8 to 10 mL of whole blood were collected via the inferior vena cava from each rat under pentobarbital anesthesia. The PBMCs were isolated from rat whole blood by centrifugation through Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden).19

PREPARATION OF COMPLEMENTARY RNA AND GENE CHIP HYBRIDIZATION

Preparation of complementary RNA (cRNA), hybridization, and scanning of high-density oligonucleotide microarray were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Affymetrix Inc, Santa Clara, California). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from PBMCs using TRIzol (GIBCO BRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) and eluted using an RNeasy spin column (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, California). Ten micrograms of total RNA were converted into double-stranded complementary DNA (cDNA) by reverse transcription using SuperScript Choice System (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, California) with the T7-(dT)24 primer (5'-GGC CAG TGA ATT GTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG AGG CGG [dT24]). The double-stranded cDNA product was extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol using Phase Lock Gels (Eppendorf, Westbury, New York). Double-stranded cDNA was in vitro transcribed into cRNA and nucleotides were biotinylated using the Enzo BioArray HighYield RNA Transcript Labeling Kit (Affymetrix). The in vitro transcription product was further purified using RNeasy mini columns (Qiagen) and fragmented as previously described.20 The fragmented in vitro transcription product was hybridized onto the rat genome U34A DNA GeneChip Array (Affymetrix), which contained approximately 7000 full-length sequences and 1000 EST (expressed sequence tag) clusters. The sequences were selected from the UniGene database. All 12 PBMC samples were subjected to RNA extraction and transcript profiling.

DATA AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

An absolute expression analysis was performed using Affymetrix MAS 5.0, and the data from genes were imported into GeneSpring software version 5.1 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, California) for further analyses. Differentially expressed genes were selected. Differential expression was defined as a change of at least 2-fold vs respective controls. Nonparametric tests were used, assuming nonequal means, specifically the Welch t test and Welch analysis of variance. The significance level was set at more than 2-fold change between groups, P < .05.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Rats treated with NaT showed pancreatic edema and necrosis, as we have previously observed.17, 21 Those treated with CLP were not autopsied. Adequate numbers of PBMCs were obtained from each animal studied for gene array analysis.

We compared gene transcription profiles of PBMCs in normal, untouched control animals with those with acute pancreatitis to identify those genes induced in pancreatitis (Figure 1). From the 8799 rat genes analyzed on the chip, using supervised cluster analysis, we identified 947 genes significantly changed by 2-fold in pancreatitis.


Figure 1
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Scatterplot of the differentially expressed genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from rats with acute pancreatitis compared with those from normal control animals that were not operated on. The axes are arbitrary fold changes. The red points above the line are up-regulated genes, and the blue points below the line are down-regulated genes. Nine hundred forty-seven genes were identified and subjected to further analysis (see Figure 2).



Figure 2
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Venn diagram of differential expression of the 947 genes (identified in Figure 1) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Expression was compared between rats who underwent laparotomy and ductal infusion with saline, those undergoing infusion with sodium taurocholate to induce acute pancreatitis, and those with intra-abdominal sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. One hundred forty genes induced specifically during sodium taurocholate acute pancreatitis were identified; the most induced and inhibited are depicted in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.


These 947 genes were then subjected to comparison between animals with acute pancreatitis and saline controls, which identified 170 genes that changed expression (Figure 2). Similarly, 201 unique genes were identified between rats with CLP (abdominal sepsis) and saline controls, and 409 differentially expressed genes were identified between animals with acute pancreatitis and intra-abdominal sepsis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 1. Up-regulated Genes Differentially Expressed in PBMCs in Acute Pancreatitis but Not in Septic Shock or Normal Conditionsa



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 2. Down-regulated Genes Differentially Expressed in PBMCs in Acute Pancreatitis but Not in Septic Shock or Normal Conditionsa


As shown in Figure 2, of the 170 genes that changed between pancreatitis and saline controls, 15 overlapped when compared with septic/pancreatitic animals, and another 18 overlapped with septic/normal animals. In total, 140 genes were unique to PBMCs in animals with pancreatitis. Figure 3 shows a cluster analysis of the genes from the 3 groups analyzed in Figure 2.


Figure 3
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Cluster view of genes differentially expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from rats with acute pancreatitis. A, Genes down-regulated in acute pancreatitis, but up-regulated in abdominal sepsis. B, Genes up-regulated in acute pancreatitis, but down-regulated in abdominal sepsis. The "Normal" column is RNA from saline-infused control animals.


Among the 140 genes whose expression changed in pancreatitis alone, 57 were up-regulated, while 69 were down-regulated; 25% corresponded to ESTs. Table 1 and Table 2 show the most significantly (> 3-fold) up-regulated (n = 14) and down-regulated genes (n = 33), respectively, and their known functions.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Acute pancreatitis is a disease that begins with an insult followed by autodigestion of pancreatic tissue. Inflammatory cells are recruited into the organ and an inflammatory cascade is induced, and this leads to local and systemic sequelae, which can include the respiratory, immunologic, and cardiac systems. Ten percent to 20% of patients will develop severe disease, and of those, up to 50% can die. While patients can die from overwhelming sepsis as a result of bacterial translocation,22-23 most patients are not infected in the first few weeks of the disease.24 Therefore, disease severity and prognostic indicators are not initially associated with bacterial infection.

The early immunologic response leads to the severe systemic reaction and, likely, the subsequent morbidity. The immunologic response in acute pancreatitis is different from abdominal sepsis, since the pancreas is not invaded by bacteria at the early stages; no abscesses are seen until late, and the time lines are very different.

Predicting which patients are going to progress to severe disease has been a challenge for physicians. To date, very few serum markers have been shown to be effective predictors, and the best prognostic indicators are still the clinical parameters.2, 11-15,24-25 Our laboratory has been interested in identification of new potential markers.

One method to identify new potential markers is to map out those genes that are uniquely expressed during the disease process. To our knowledge, to date, no one has actually studied the role of blood-derived inflammatory cells as markers for pancreatic inflammation. We postulate that the response to pancreatitis, and potentially the prognostic indicator of disease severity, rests in PBMCs. These are the cells that mediate the immunologic reaction to pancreatitis. While investigators have measured gene expression of the pancreas in experimental pancreatitis,26 and others have studied changes in the population of leukocytes in pancreatitis,27 to our knowledge, no one has studied the genetic map of PBMCs during disease.

We postulated that PBMCs can serve a "reporter" function as biomarkers of acute pancreatitis and, as such, would express unique genes during pancreatitis. Further, PBMCs represent an easily accessible, noninvasive source of material. We used microarray technology to asses the gene transcription profile of PBMCs in a rat model of NaT-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis. We first compared the profile of pancreatitic animals with pancreata from normal controls who were not operated on. This identified 947 genes induced during pancreatitis. To determine which of these genes were uniquely expressed during pancreatitis, we compared the PBMC RNA obtained from rats induced with pancreatitis with PMBC RNA obtained from rats that underwent saline infusion alone and with rats with intra-abdominal sepsis.

We identified 140 unique genes that were induced or inhibited in PBMCs during NaT-induced (necrotizing) pancreatic disease. Not surprisingly, some of the genes highly induced were cytokines previously implicated in pancreatitis, such as receptors for platelet-derived factor, transforming growth factor β, and a variety of G protein–related signal transduction genes. The phospholipase D1 gene was involved in the intracellular modulation of cellular mitogenesis and even pancreatic organ regeneration.28-29 The prostaglandin E2 receptor was induced, which is interesting since inhibition of prostaglandin E2 by cyclooxygenase inhibitors improves survival.30

Interestingly, genes associated with cell death, such as caspase 1 and BH3 interacting domain 3, and cell membrane integrity were uniquely down-regulated in PBMCs of rats with acute pancreatitis. Caspase 1, associated with cellular apoptosis, has been studied in acute pancreatitis,31 and its activation within the pancreas is associated with severe necrosis,32 but its inhibition may be protective in sepsis.33 BH3 domain proteins are also involved in mitochondrial-mediated cell death34 via BCL-2 mediate apoptosis.35 How these PBMC-associated apoptosis processes relate to pancreatic necrosis remains to be studied.

What is striking is that some genes associated with pancreatitis, namely the glucocorticoid receptor, cholecystokinin receptor, and lipase, were significantly inhibited, each by 7-fold. We have shown that glucocorticoid treatment can improve survival in animal models of pancreatitis,36 and others have described a relationship between glucocorticoids and the cholecystokinin receptor in the disease process.37 Use of either compound after the induction of the disease has not been studied.

Our data show that in acute pancreatitis, PBMCs express genes that are related to pancreatic illness and not intra-abdominal sepsis. This observation, that pancreatitis-related genes are induced in cells outside the pancreas in PBMCs during necrotizing pancreatitis, has not been previously described, to our knowledge. It should not be surprising that such genes are induced; these genes were originally identified from inflamed pancreatic tissue, which likely already had similar PBMCs infiltrating it. However, because the PBMCs are involved in the systemic inflammatory response to pancreatitis, following their expression/activation during the evolution of pancreatitis should be illuminating. The ability of easily accessible blood leukocytes to provide a reporter function for solid organ disease will likely prove useful in pancreatitis, as we have shown in other diseases.38 Furthermore, this approach may identify as of yet unknown genes involved in the pathogenesis of disease. Mapping the expression pattern of these genes in the clinical arena might help differentiate the patients who have mild, moderate, and severe pancreatitis, including necrosis and systemic complications. Future studies will establish a panel of these genes to differentiate between sepsis, pancreatitis, and severe necrotizing pancreatitis and determine if serum concentration of these new molecular markers, obtained from cells within the blood that modulate the inflammatory response to pancreatitis, correlate to the severity of pancreatitis. If they predict occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction, it is then conceivable that these markers will predict the outcome of the disease.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Martin Bluth, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Box 40, 450 Clarkson Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11203 (martin.bluth{at}downstate.edu).

Accepted for Publication: November 12, 2007.

Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Bluth, Zhang, and Zenilman. Acquisition of data: Lin and Viterbo. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bluth, Lin, and Zenilman. Drafting of the manuscript: Bluth, Lin, Zhang, Viterbo, and Zenilman. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bluth, Lin, and Zenilman. Statistical analysis: Zhang. Obtained funding: Zenilman. Administrative, technical, and material support: Bluth, Lin, Viterbo, and Zenilman. Study supervision: Bluth and Zenilman.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant DK054511 from the National Institutes of Health (Dr Zenilman).

Previous Presentations: This work was presented as a poster abstract at Digestive Disease Week, 104th Annual Meeting of the Gastroenterological Association; May 17-23, 2003; Orlando, Florida. The abstract was also published in Gastroenterology. 2003;124(suppl 1):pA803.

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Baron TH, Morgan D. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(18):1412-1417. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis: summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128(5):586-590. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Foitzik T, Lewandrowski KB, Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Evidence for extraluminal trypsinogen activation in three different models of acute pancreatitis. Surgery. 1994;115(6):698-702. ISI | PUBMED
4. Lerch MM, Hernández CA, Adler G. Gallstones and acute pancreatitis—mechanisms and mechanics. Dig Dis. 1994;12(4):242-247. ISI | PUBMED
5. Senninger N, Moody FG, Coelho JC, Van Buren DH. The role of biliary obstruction in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis in the opossum. Surgery. 1986;99(6):688-693. ISI | PUBMED
6. Steer ML, Meldolesi J. The cell biology of experimental pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(3):144-150. ISI | PUBMED
7. De Campos T, Deree J, Coimbra R. From acute pancreatitis to end-organ injury: mechanisms of acute lung injury. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007;8(1):107-120. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
8. Zhang H, Patel SA, Kandil E, Mueller CM, Lin YY, Zenilman ME. Pancreatic elastase is proven to be a mannose-binding protein—implications for the systemic response to pancreatitis. Surgery. 2003;133(6):678-688. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
9. Jaffray C, Mendez C, Denham W, Carter G, Norman J. Specific pancreatic enzymes activate macrophages to produce tumor necrosis factor-alpha: role of nuclear factor kappa B and inhibitory kappa B proteins. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(4):370-377. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
10. Jaffray C, Yang J, Carter G, Mendez C, Norman J. Pancreatic elastase activates pulmonary nuclear factor kappa B and inhibitory kappa B, mimicking pancreatitis-associated adult respiratory distress syndrome. Surgery. 2000;128(2):225-231. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Ranson JHC, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, Fink SD, Eng K, Spencer FC. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139(1):69-81. ISI | PUBMED
12. Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS. Assessment of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86(10):1385-1391. ISI | PUBMED
13. Corfield AP, Cooper MJ, Williamson RCN; et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):403-407. ISI | PUBMED
14. Triester SL, Kowdley KV. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(2):167-176. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
15. Papachristou GI, Clermont G, Sharma A, Yadav D, Whitcomb DC. Risk and markers of severe acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36(2):277-296. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
16. Iovanna JL, Keim V, Nordback I; et al. Serum levels of pancreatitis-associated protein as indicators of the course of acute pancreatitis: Multicentric Study Group on Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 1994;106(3):728-734. ISI | PUBMED
17. Zenilman ME, Tuchman D, Zheng Q, Levine J, Delany H. Comparison of reg I and reg III levels during acute pancreatitis in the rat. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):646-652. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
18. Bluth MH, Kandil E, Mueller CM; et al. Sophorolipids block lethal effects of septic shock in rats in a cecal ligation and puncture model of experimental sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):188-195. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
19. Bluth MH, Norowitz KB, Chice S; et al. IgE, CD8(+)CD60+ T cells and IFN-alpha in human immunity to parvovirus B19 in selective IgA deficiency. Hum Immunol. 2005;66(10):1029-1038. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
20. Wodicka L, Dong H, Mittmann M, Ho MH, Lockhart DJ. Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15(13):1359-1367. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Zhang H, Kandil E, Lin YY, Levi G, Zenilman ME. Targeted inhibition of gene expression of pancreatitis-associated proteins exacerbates the severity of acute pancreatitis in rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(9):870-881. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
22. Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, Pralle U. Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg. 1997;21(2):130-135. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
23. Ammori BJ. Role of the gut in the course of severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2003;26(2):122-129. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
24. Uhl W, Warshaw A, Imrie C; et al, International Association of Pancreatology. Guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2002;2(6):565-573. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
25. Taylor SL, Morgan DL, Denson KD, Lane MM, Pennington LR. A comparison of the Ranson, Glasgow, and APACHE II scoring systems to a multiple organ system score in predicting patient outcome in pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 2005;189(2):219-222. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
26. Ji B, Chen XQ, Misek DE; et al. Pancreatic gene expression during the initiation of acute pancreatitis: identification of EGR-1 as a key regulator. Physiol Genomics. 2003;14(1):59-72. FREE FULL TEXT
27. Pezzilli R, Billi P, Beltrandi E; et al. Circulating lymphocyte subsets in human acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1995;11(1):95-100. ISI | PUBMED
28. Rydzewska G, Rivard N, Morisset J. Dynamics of pancreatic tyrosine kinase and phospholipase D activities in the course of cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis and during regeneration. Pancreas. 1995;10(4):382-388. ISI | PUBMED
29. Huang P, Frohman MA. The potential for phospholipase D as a new therapeutic target. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007;11(5):707-716. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
30. Foitzik T, Hotz HG, Hotz B, Wittig F, Buhr HJ. Selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) reduces prostaglandin E2 production and attenuates systemic disease sequelae in experimental pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50(52):1159-1162. PUBMED
31. Paszkowski AS, Rau B, Mayer JM, Moller P, Beger HG. Therapeutic application of caspase 1/interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme inhibitor decreases the death rate in severe acute experimental pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(1):68-76. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
32. Rau B, Baumgart K, Paszkowski AS, Mayer JM, Beger HG. Clinical relevance of caspase-1 activated cytokines in acute pancreatitis: high correlation of serum interleukin-18 with pancreatic necrosis and systemic complications. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(8):1556-1562. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
33. Sarkar A, Hall MW, Exline M; et al. Caspase-1 regulates Escherichia coli sepsis and splenic B cell apoptosis independently of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-18. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(9):1003-1010. FREE FULL TEXT
34. Webster KA, Graham RM, Thompson JW; et al. Redox stress and the contributions of BH3-only proteins to infarction. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8(9-10):1667-1676. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
35. Green DR. Life, death, BH3 profiles, and the salmon mousse. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(2):97-99. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
36. Kandil E, Lin YY, Bluth MH, Zhang H, Levi G, Zenilman ME. Dexamethasone mediates protection against acute pancreatitis via upregulation of pancreatitis-associated proteins. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(42):6806-6811. ISI | PUBMED
37. Gomez G, Townsend CM Jr, Green D, Rajaraman S, Uchida T, Thompson JC. Involvement of cholecystokinin receptors in the adverse effect of glucocorticoids on diet-induced necrotizing pancreatitis. Surgery. 1989;106(2):230-236. ISI | PUBMED
38. Bluth MH, Bluth MJ, Johns C, Kahn S, Lin YY, Zenilman ME, Cheung WW. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene array profiles in patients with overactive bladder [abstract]. J Immunol. 2007;178:132.8.. http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/178/MeetingAbstracts/S246-d.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Use of Gene Expression Profiles in Cells of Peripheral Blood to Identify New Molecular Markers of Acute Pancreatitis—Invited Critique
Nita Ahuja
Arch Surg. 2008;143(3):233-234.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.