This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • CME Course for This Article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Revascularization  • Cardiovascular System  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery  • Cardiovascular Intervention  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Rocco Ricciardi, MD, MPH; Beth A. Virnig, PhD, MPH; James W. Ogilvie Jr, MD; Peter S. Dahlberg, MD; Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH; Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):338-344.

Hypothesis  We hypothesized that the recent reduction in procedure volume for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has led to an increase in the in-hospital mortality rate.

Design  Hospital discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2003.

Setting  A 20% random sample of patients admitted to US hospitals.

Patients  All patients who underwent CABG or percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions. Facilities performing CABG were assigned to standard volume cutoffs.

Main Outcome Measures  Rates of cardiac procedures and the proportion of hospitals meeting standard volume cutoffs, as well as the CABG mortality rate.

Results  During our 16-year study period, the rate of CABG increased from 7.2 cases per 1000 discharges in 1988 to 12.2 cases in 1997 but then decreased to 9.1 cases in 2003, while the rate of percutaneous interventions tripled. For CABG, the proportion of high-volume hospitals declined from 32.5% in 1997 to 15.5% in 2003. Despite shifts between high- and low-volume hospitals, the CABG mortality rate steadily declined from 5.4% in 1988 to 3.3% in 2003. Hospitals performing the lowest volume of CABG experienced the largest decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate.

Conclusions  Since 1997, CABG volume has declined in the setting of a decrease in in-hospital mortality. A lower mortality rate in the setting of reduced CABG volume is a counterintuitive finding, suggesting that procedure volume is an insufficient predictor of outcome on which to base regionalization strategies.

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Medical School (Drs Ricciardi, Virnig, Ogilvie, and Dahlberg), and Division of Health Services Research, School of Public Health (Dr Virnig), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Division of Clinical Care Research, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Selker); and Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Baxter). Dr Ricciardi is now with the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Clinic, Tufts University, Burlington, Massachusetts.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Institutional Variability of Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Utilization in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Maddux et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:403-411.
ABSTRACT  

Shop for Quality or Volume? Volume, Quality, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Auerbach et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:696-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume and Outcome: Equipoise at Last
Hogan and Winter
Arch Surg 2008;143:1235-1235.
FULL TEXT