This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Colorectal Surgery  • Review  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Sanjay Purkayastha, BSc, MRCS; Henry S. Tilney, MRCS; Ara W. Darzi, MD, FRCS, KBE, FMedSci; Paris P. Tekkis, MD, FRCS

Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):788-793.

Objective  To compare outcomes following abdominal surgery with or without the use of chewing gum in the early postoperative period.

Data Sources  MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases.

Study Selection  Randomized controlled trials reporting 1 or more outcomes related to functional postoperative recovery. Study quality was assessed using a validated scale.

Data Extraction  Time to the first passage of flatus, time to first bowel movement, and length of postoperative stay.

Data Synthesis  Five trials (158 patients) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Time (in days) for the patient to pass flatus (weighted mean difference [WMD], – 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], – 1.11 to – 0.20; P = .005) and the time until the first bowel movement (WMD, – 1.10; 95% CI, – 1.79 to – 0.42; P = .002) were significantly reduced in the chewing gum group compared with controls. However, both of these results demonstrated significant heterogeneity. Postoperative length of stay was also reduced in the chewing gum group by longer than 1 day (WMD, – 1.25; 95% CI, – 3.27 to 0.77; P = .23); however, this result was not statistically significant. This result was significant when studies that explicitly included patients with stomas being formed during the surgery were excluded (WMD, – 2.46; 95% CI, – 3.14 to – 1.79; P < .001), with no significant heterogeneity.

Conclusions  Chewing gum may enhance intestinal recovery following colectomy and reduce the length of hospital stay. Owing to the potential for substantial cost savings, larger-scale, blinded, randomized controlled trials with placebo arms are warranted.

Author Affiliations: Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, England.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sham-Feed or Sham?
Parnaby et al.
Arch Surg 2009;144:382-382.
FULL TEXT