• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine  • Adult Critical Care  • Quality of Care  • Patient Safety/ Medical Error  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut  • Neurosurgery  • Surgical Physiology  • Surgical Physiology, Other  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Gastroenterology  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Carrie Y. Peterson, MD; Michael Krzyzaniak, MD; Raul Coimbra, MD, PhD; David C. Chang, MBA, MPH, PhD

Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):76-80. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.237

Objective  To determine whether injured patients who received a vagotomy would have worse outcomes after injury.

Design  Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database over 10 years.

Patients  Patients admitted for trauma (primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9 ] diagnosis codes 800-959) who had a vagotomy (ICD-9 procedure codes 44.00, 44.01, and 44.03) were included. A second cohort of injured patients without vagotomy was extracted and matched 3 to 1 on the following criteria: age, race, sex, concurrent splenectomy, survival risk ratio, payer status, comorbidities, and calendar year.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included septicemia, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome, ulcer disease, length of stay, and total charges.

Results  A total of 56 and 115 patients were included in the vagotomy and control groups, respectively, and were similar in demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and injury severity. We found that the vagotomy group had elevated mortality (27.27% vs 9.57% for controls; P = .003). Patients who received vagotomy also had more septicemia (26.79% vs 3.48%; P < .001) and ulcer disease (71.43% vs 2.61%; P < .001) but not systemic inflammatory response syndrome or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients who received vagotomy also had an increased length of hospital stay (36.4 vs 9.6 mean days; P < .001) and total cost ($211 899.90 vs $59 321.64; P < .001).

Conclusions  Vagotomy after traumatic injury is associated with an increase in ulcer disease, septicemia, and mortality. This may reflect a loss of control over the systemic response to injury and warrants further study.

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Vagotomy, Inflammation, and the Injured Patient: Comment on "Vagus Nerve and Postinjury Inflammatory Response"
Gregory J. Jurkovich
Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):80.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vagotomy, Inflammation, and the Injured Patient: Comment on "Vagus Nerve and Postinjury Inflammatory Response"
Jurkovich
Arch Surg 2012;147:80-80.
FULL TEXT