You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 100 No. 5, May 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (47)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Doppler Ultrasound Examination

Its Use in Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Venous Disease

Bernard Sigel, MD; George L. Popky, MD; Esmond M. Mapp, MD; Polly Feigl, PhD; W. Robert Felix, Jr, MD; Johannes Ipsen, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1970;100(5):535-540.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In a previous publication, we described a Doppler ultrasound method for diagnosing venous disease of the lower extremities.1 This technique is used to detect occlusion of deep veins due to thrombosis and incompetent valves associated with the postphlebitic syndrome. The preliminary results in 72 patients with confirmed diagnoses indicated that the ultrasound method was significantly more precise than clinical appraisal alone in the diagnosis of thrombotic occlusion of deep veins of the lower extremities.2 We have expanded this series by adding 75 more patients in whom confirmation of Doppler ultrasound findings was obtained usually by venography and occasionally by operation or autopsy. As our experience has increased, we have simplified the examination for occlusion by deleting certain maneuvers which were found to be redundant. This has enabled us to evolve a more systematic and specific set of criteria for abnormality on the ultrasound examination. Furthermore, the additional clinical . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Philadelphia

From the departments of Surgery (Drs. Sigel and Felix) and radiology (Dr. Mapp), Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania, the departments of surgery (Drs. Sigel and Felix) and radiology (Dr. Popky), Veterans Administration Hospital, and the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (Drs. Feigl and Ipsen), Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 6, 1970.

Reprint requests to Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19129 (Dr. Sigel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.