You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 12, December 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

More on Adrenalectomy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BENJAMIN S. LEUNG, PHD
Portland, Ore

Arch Surg. 1975;110(12):1517.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—I am responding to the article by Brown et al, entitled "Bilateral Adrenalectomy for Metastatic Breast Carcinoma" (Arch Surg 110:77-81, 1975). Several of their findings were in agreement with our published results, as listed below:

  1. Sulfokinase activity in breast cancer tissue is not a good predictive index for adrenalectomy.1 Since our preliminary report, more than 56 patients have been evaluated; results were not encouraging.

  1. In evaluating 119 patients who had undergone adrenalectomy in our institution, we did not find any correlation of a tumor-free interval to subsequent response to adrenalectomy. Forty percent of the patients with tumor-free intervals of less than one year had responded to adrenalectomy, compared with 47% to 48% of patients with longer tumor-free intervals.1 However, other clinical criteria, such as age, menopausal status, and cytohormonal evaluation, are of minor importance in relationship to subsequent clinical response to adrenalectomy.
  2. It has
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.