This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

ROBERT M. GOLDWYN, MD

Arch Surg. 1978;113(9):1033.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

For a disquieting confrontation with reality, ask the medical student or resident to identify Galen, Pare, Jenner, Lister, Halsted, or Osler. It is astonishing how few traces the giants have left on the cerebral cortices of the young. This unfortunate situation is not only testimony to the truth of sic transit gloria mundi but is evidence of the neglect of medical history by institutions entrusted with the education of physicians.

Addressing the question, "Of what use is medical history?" King¹ has cited what many would consider its paramount benefit:

... the study of history enormously enlarges the experience of the individual, allowing him to transcend his personal limitations and to encompass the experience of those who have lived before and who have left appropriate records. For the student of history, the limitations of space and time disappear....

History, in short, gives perspective to performance. It helps the physician to distinguish . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Department of Surgery Harvard University School of Medicine Boston, MA 02146

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?