You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 3, March 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

LARRY C. CAREY, MD; PETER J. FABRI, MD
Columbus, Ohio

Arch Surg. 1979;114(3):343.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—The respiratory distress syndrome, as manifested by increased pulmonary venous admixture, continues to be an important challenge in the management of multiply transfused patients. The study presented in the ARCHIVES (113:947-950, 1978), addresses the efficacy of Swank micropore transfusion filters in preventing increased pulmonary arterial venous shunting in surgical patients. They present a considerable increase in shunting as well as alveolar-arterial oxygen difference in patients transfused over 20% of blood volume through standard transfusion filters, but no difference in the same parameters in patients who were transfused through Dacron wool filters.

In evaluating their preoperative data, it is apparent that the groups were noticeably different before surgery and that both groups had identical shunts and alveolar-arterial oxygen differences postoperatively. In addition, if the single patient with substantially elevated preoperative shunting were excluded from consideration, postoperative shunting would actually be less in patients with standard transfusion filters.

Although . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.