This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

ROBERT W. BEART, JR, MD
Rochester, Minn

Arch Surg. 1979;114(5):639.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—I read with interest the article by Dr Frank J. Lepreau in the December 1978 issue of the ARCHIVES (113:1479), relating his experience with one case of low anterior resection with staples.

There is currently no reasonable information available that would substantiate Dr Lepreau's claim that a low anterior anastomosis is considerably simplified or more secure, or that the staples provide a cost-effective mode of putting bowel back together. We are currently involved in a randomized prospective study utilizing the stapler and have performed over 50 low anterior anastomoses with this device. Our experience suggests that although the instrument seems to have certain specific technical advantages, it certainly is not a panacea. This instrument should not be regarded as the most cost-effective way to reanastomize bowel. It seems inappropriate to me to present the instrument in this light with so little information available. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?