This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert H. Fitzgerald, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(7):771.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Although the fear of "hospitalism" is past, and the surgical patient no longer is "... exposed to more chances of death than the English soldier on the field of Waterloo,"¹ the incidence of postoperative wound infections can be decreased. The adoption of Whitfield's high-efficiency particulate air filtration with laminar airflow to the operating room by John Charnley has introduced a new technique into the surgeon's armamentarium. While surgeons await scientific evaluation of the various modifications of unidirectional airflow facilities, emotional arguments about the future rates of infection with use of this system discredit the profession.

In this symposium, the various types of unidirectional facilities in use are described. The ability of these facilities to lower airborne bacterial contamination in the operating room is well documented by the various authors.

Will this lowered level of airborne bacterial contamination of the operating room reduce the incidence of postoperative sepsis? We all await . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 11, 1978.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?