You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 6, June 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgery Annual 1983

edited by L. Nyhus, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1983; Yearbook of Surgery 1983, by Schwartz, Najarian, Peacock, et al, Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers, 1983.

BEN EISEMAN, MD, Reviewer
Denver

Arch Surg. 1984;119(6):741.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A busy surgeon has an impossible task in trying to read all the journals and staying current with advances in his field. The problem is compounded by the sheer mass of articles that compete for his time. Few articles, even those in journals referred to often, are important to his practice or are of fundamental interest. There is a significant need, therefore, for critical annual reviews or abstracts that provide the clinical and academic surgeon with a source of easy reference and guidance. It also helps to have a critical expert separate the wheat from the professional chaff.

Surgery Annual 1983 presents 18 pithy reviews of topics ranging from the role of religious guidance for the surgical patient to the use of operative ultrasonography. The chapters are from 12 to 31 pages long, including extensive bibliographies, which are obviously important in such review articles. There is anticipated uneven worth in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.