This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

RICHARD M. GORE, MD; ROBERT L. VOGELZANG, MD
Chicago

Arch Surg. 1987;122(5):620.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—We read with interest the article by Dr Neoptolemos and colleagues¹ concerning the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis and treatment of gallstone acute pancreatitis. The authors state that noninvasive imaging modalities, including ultrasonography and computed tomography, are of "dubious" value for detecting choledocholithiasis. We have found these modalities, especially computed tomography, to be quite useful in this regard. By using state-of-the-art equipment, fast scanners (2 s), and fine collimation (5 mm) scans, intraductal stones can be detected in up to 90% of cases.^2,3 Improved ultrasound techniques, including scanning the intrapancreatic bile duct transversely with the patient upright, can increase the rate of sonographic detection to 89% and 70% for proximal and distal stones, respectively.⁴ The noninvasive imaging modalities can provide a fairly accurate screen for choledocholithiasis and should be considered before more invasive studies are undertaken. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?