This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

EOGHAN R. T. C. OWEN, FRCS
Harrow, Middlesex, England

Arch Surg. 1989;124(6):752.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—Dr Ravitch's reply to my communication^1,2 requires clarification.

I certainly do not feel that patients' behavior is to blame for leaks and perforations following bariatric surgery. However, their noncompliance may well be a factor in early, and possibly even late, staple line disruption after gastric partitioning. This is an entirely different situation. Leaks and perforations are life-threatening but staple line disruptions usually are not. A small disruption may only be apparent on upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy or barium studies, but if the disruption is large, then gastric restriction will be lost. After a small disruption, the whole staple line could "unzip." If restriction is lost, the operation usually fails, particularly if this occurs in the early postoperative stage.

We know little about staple line healing in the morbidly obese human's stomach. If gastric restriction is going to be successful, even in carefully selected cases, knowledge of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?