This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

DAVID L. NAHRWOLD, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(7):769-770.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Surgeons have been receiving the news of lithotripsy for gallstones with anxiety and some disdain. The initial pieces of the story have seemed to be a rewrite of the advent of endoscopy, biliary stenting for pancreatic cancer, endoscopic polypectomy, and percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses. The possibility that an operation done by surgeons since 1882 may be replaced by a procedure not involving an incision, and that this procedure may not be done by surgeons, is disconcerting, to say the least.

While some surgeons have reacted by predicting that lithotripsy will cause gallbladder perforations, obstructed common ducts, and recurrent stones, a reaction that might be interpreted as a sophisticated form of denial, others have preferred to watch and wait, suffering silently, and a few have planned joint ventures, limited partnerships, and other schemes to invest in machines, for motives seemingly transparent, but truly known only to themselves. Hospital administrators, presumably . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Chicago, Ill

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?