You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 11, November 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Elective Cholecystectomy After Biliary Lithotripsy: An Indication for Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography?

I. MICHAEL LEITMAN, MD; KIMBERLY VAN ZEE, MD; ANTHONY C. ANTONACCI, MD
New York, NY

Arch Surg. 1990;125(11):1517.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—Given the increasing popularity of extracorporeal shock wave biliary lithotripsy and the fact that small stone fragments leave the gallbladder via the common bile duct, the complications of this therapy are now becoming more apparent. We report a case of a patient who underwent elective cholecystectomy after failing biliary lithotripsy. There were no indications of intraoperative cholangiography except the presumption that stone fragments were likely to have traveled down the common bile duct.

Report of a Case.—A 50-year-old Hispanic woman presented with recurrent postprandial right upper quadrant pain and nausea 6 months after undergoing biliary lithotripsy for symptomatic cholelithiasis. These symptoms began 10 years before admission. Prior to lithotripsy, a single 2-cm gallstone was documented sonographically. Her symptoms persisted and she requested surgical treatment. She denied a history of dark urine, acholic stools, jaundice, fever, or chills. Physical examination was significant for a well-appearing anicteric . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.