This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

MARC R. NUMER, MD, PHD; SAM S. AHN, MD; SHELDON E. JORDAN, MD; WESLEY S. MOORE, MD
Los Angeles, Calif

Arch Surg. 1991;126(1):115.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—We agree with many of the conclusions and observations made by Elmore and colleagues¹ in the June 1990 issue of the ARCHIVES regarding monitoring for carotid endarterectomy with computerized electroencephalographic (EEG) brain mapping. However, in their discussion of our previous reports on this topic, they incorrectly cited the criteria we used. They said we used only new asymmetry as a criterion for EEG "change." However, we actually reported^2,3 on any significant EEG "change" on carotid cross-clamping, whether it was a new asymmetry or a generalized change from intraoperative preclamp baseline EEG. We only required that the change be substantially greater than the ordinary fluctuations seen during the routine baseline portion of the operation, prior to clamping. Many of the changes reported in our study were indeed generalized changes of the EEG background, including generalized loss of fast activity, increase in slow activity, or, occasionally, a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?