You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 2, February 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence and Brief Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Indications for Surgical Débridement

COL MARTIN L. FACKLER, MC
USA (Ret) Gainesville, Fla

MAJ JOHN M. UHORCHAK, MC
USA West Point, NY

CPT PAUL J. DOUGHERTY, MC
USA Presidio of San Francisco, Calif

Arch Surg. 1992;127(2):239-240.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—When we read the article by Basadre and Parry1 in the January 1991 issue of the ARCHIVES, we were unsure of the exact surgical technique used in "surgical débridement" in the description of their cases.

The term débridement has evolved from the French language, in which it means "to remove constriction by incision."2 However, Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary3 defines débridement as "the removal of foreign material and devitalized or contaminated tissue from or adjacent to a traumatic or infected lesion until surrounding healthy tissue is exposed." Most American surgeons use the term to mean roughly what Dorland's suggests: basically a wound excision vs a wound incision implied in the French definition.

Basadre and Parry1 recommend "operative débridement" for patients presenting 7 days after injury, and reported "negative surgical exploration" when no pus was found. This description seems quite close to the original French . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.