This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (43)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

How Important Is It?

Ira M. Rutkow, MD, MPH, DrPH

Arch Surg. 1995;130(6):575-576.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In 1891, William Bull, one of this country's most prominent surgeons, wrote of hernia repairs, "It is wise to... estimate the value of given procedures by the relative proportion of relapses."¹ One year later, William Halsted trumpeted Bull's comment when he presented hernia surgery outcomes solely in terms of recurrence rates: "Bassini failed but seven times in 251 cases.... It is now nearly four years that I have been operating for the cure of inguinal hernia... and thus far I have no failure to record."² Halsted showed neither a consequential regard for nor an appreciation of other surgical outcome measures. Specifically, the questions of short- and long-term postoperative discomfort and ability to return to daily activities and work never entered into his evaluation of hernia repair techniques. Such thinking was most evident in Halsted's discussion of an 1895 article by Christian Fenger on groin hernia: "Three weeks . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Freehold, NJ

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?