You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 21 No. 4, October 1930 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

FORTY-SECOND REPORT OF PROGRESS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

PHILIP D. WILSON, M.D.; LLOYD T. BROWN, M.D.; M. N. SMITH-PETERSEN, M.D.; JOHN G. KUHNS, M.D.; EDWIN F. CAVE, M.D.; RALPH K. GHORMLEY, M.D.; MURRAY S. DANFORTH, M.D.; GEORGE PERKINS; ARTHUR VAN DESSEL, M.D.; C. HERMANN BUCHOLZ, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1930;21(4):702-716.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MISCELLANEOUS

Charcot's Arthropathy.

—Wile and Butler32 analyzed the records and physical observations in eighty-eight patients affected with Charcot's arthropathy, and came to the following conclusions:

The greatest age incidence was between 35 and 55 years. In the majority of cases the onset was gradual and insidious and extended over a period of months or years. The occasional sudden production of the condition was frequently the result of trauma bringing into visibility a preexisting subclinical process. The condition occurred three times more frequently in men than in women as compared with the incidence of tabes. Polyarticular involvement was common, no joint in the body being immune, but involvement of the knees and ankles occurred far more commonly than did any other form. Cerebrospinal syphilis was present in the majority of cases. Its absence, however, in typical cases indicated that it was not the essential primary etiologic factor. When present, the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON; ROCHESTER, MINN.; PROVIDENCE, R. I.; LONDON, ENGLAND; LOUVAIN, BELGIUM; HALLE, GERMANY



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1930 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.