You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 26 No. 1, January 1933 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

FORTY-NINTH REPORT OF PROGRESS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

JOHN G. KUHNS, M.D.; EDWIN F. CAVE, M.D.; SUMNER M. ROBERTS, M.D.; JOSEPH S. BARR, M.D.; JOSEPH A. FREIBERG, M.D.; JOSEPH E. MILGRAM, M.D.; GEORGE PERKINS; PHILIP D. WILSON, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1933;26(1):160-168.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This Report of Progress is based on a review of 195 articles selected from 359 articles dealing with orthopedic surgery appearing in the medical literature approximately between April 5 and July 30, 1932. A few selected articles of an earlier date are included. Only those papers that seemed to represent progress have been chosen for review.

CONGENITAL DEFORMITIES

Open Reduction of Congenital Dislocation of the Hip.

—Howorth and Smith1 reported observations in 72 cases of congenital dislocation of the hip in which the patients were treated by open operation from January, 1920, to July, 1929. In 26 cases the dislocation was bilateral. The average age was 4 years and 8 months. In the treatment of 46 of the 82 hips, previous attempts at closed reduction had failed.

The operations used were as follows: (1) simple reduction, 54 per cent; (2) gouging of the acetabulum followed by reduction, 20 per . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON; CINCINNATI; NEW YORK; LONDON, ENGLAND; Advisory Editor BOSTON



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1933 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.