You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 27 No. 1, July 1933 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

DIAGNOSIS OF SURGICAL TUBERCULOSIS

COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSIS BY INOCULATION OF GUINEA-PIGS AND BY CULTURE

JOHN E. BLAIR, Ph.D.; FRANCES A. HALLMAN, A.B.

Arch Surg. 1933;27(1):178-188.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In recent years the use of culture methods for the isolation of tubercle bacilli in the diagnosis of tuberculosis has received considerable attention. Several methods have been proposed for the isolation of tubercle bacilli, the majority being based on procedures designed to eliminate possible contaminants and to supply the peculiar nutritive requirements of the tubercle bacillus. Thus, the methods of Hohn,1 Petragnani,2 Miraglia3 and Loewenstein4 have been employed in various European laboratories, while the procedures devised by Petroff,5 Corper and Uyei,6 Sweany and Evanoff7 and others have received attention in this country.

Corper and Uyei studied the relative efficiency of various alkalis and acids in destroying contaminants in tuberculous materials. They concluded that acids, as recommended by Loewenstein, were superior to alkalis, and of the former, sulphuric acid gave the best results in their first series of tests. Based on this, they first . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Laboratory Division, Hospital for Joint Diseases.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1933 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.