You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 4, April 1937 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PERITONITIS

I. THE EFFECT ON BLOOD PRESSURE OF THE PERITONEAL CONTENT IN SUPPURATIVE AND IN BILE PERITONITIS

PAUL H. HARMON, M.D., Ph.D.; HENRY N. HARKINS, M.D., Ph.D.

Arch Surg. 1937;34(4):565-579.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

One of the common hypotheses of the cause of death from peritonitis is that of vasomotor collapse incident to the absorption of toxins from the peritoneum. It has long been assumed that causative micro-organisms have been the source of the toxins, with the peritoneum acting merely as an absorptive membrane of a large surface area. As early as 1902 certain authors,1 on the basis of experimental results, advocated preliminary nonspecific irritation of the peritoneum to prevent the absorption of toxins. They believed that peritoneal absorption was retarded by a fibrinous exudate. The physiology of the peritoneum is now better understood. This knowledge has been reviewed by Cunningham2 and by Livingston.3 Steinberg4 clarified the situation with a clearcut series of experiments in which the diphtheria bacillus was used for intraperitoneal injection. While he found death to be due to the corresponding toxin, resistance was believed to be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CHICAGO

From the Douglas Smith Foundation and from the Service of Dr. Edmund Andrews, Department of Surgery, the University of Chicago.


Footnotes

Read in part before the Chicago Surgical Society, Feb. 7, 1936.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1937 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.