This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JOHN H. GIBBON, Jr., M.D.

Arch Surg. 1937;34(6):1105-1131.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Approximately one hundred and forty-two Trendelenburg operations for massive pulmonary embolism have been reported, and only nine of the patients operated on have left the hospital as cured.¹ This exceedingly high mortality is due to the critical condition of the patient and to the operative procedure, which entails the complete throttling of the great vessels leading from the heart for a brief period. Because of the difficulty in diagnosis and the uncertain prognosis, Nyström² advised postponing the operation until the patient is practically moribund. Then, as Churchill³ has stated, "the procedure could perhaps be more properly termed an immediate postmortem examination than a surgical operation."

Nyström and Blalock⁴ have demonstrated experimentally that occlusion of the pulmonary artery alone may be safely maintained for a longer period than occlusion of both the pulmonary artery and the aorta. Kiser¹ found that constriction of the afferent vessels of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
PHILADELPHIA

From the Surgical Research Laboratories of the Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?