This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JULIAN JOHNSON, M.D., D.M.Sc.; I. S. RAVDIN, M.D.; HARRY M. VARS, Ph.D.; HAROLD A. ZINTEL, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1940;40(6):1104-1115.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Careful preparation of the patient who is a poor surgical risk has greatly reduced the morbidity and mortality following surgical operations. In no field of surgery has this been more definitely proved than in the treatment of obstruction of the common bile duct and of serious hepatic injury. The histologic picture of the liver in these conditions often is one of extensive hepatitis, fibrous tissue replacement, parenchymal degeneration and fatty infiltration. Prior to operation, tests of hepatic function may give little or no indication of the degree of injury to the liver parenchyma. However, subsequent to the trauma of operation and anesthesia, hepatic insufficiency of such degree as to jeopardize the life of the patient may become evident. Extensive damage to the liver may be present before it is detectable by the tests now available. For this reason it is safe to assume that damage to the liver is present . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
PHILADELPHIA

From the Harrison Department of Surgical Research, Schools of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Footnotes
Aided by the Merck Fund for Surgical Research.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?