You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 6, December 1941 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PHYSIOLOGIC BEHAVIOR OF THE HUMAN APPENDIX AND THE PROBLEM OF APPENDICITIS

REACTION OF THE APPENDIX TO DRUGS

CLARENCE DENNIS, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1941;43(6):1021-1060.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PART 1. INTRODUCTION

I. PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY

Although a host of theories as to the etiology of acute appendicitis has been offered, many with strong supporting evidence, the disease has not been proved capable of experimental production either in man or in related species except by the obstructive mechanism.1

By longitudinal section of 91 surgically removed appendixes fixed in solution of formaldehyde, Wangensteen and Bowers2 found all the gangrenous specimens to show obstruction of the lumen, but in only 72 per cent of 43 cases of acute suppurative appendicitis was obstruction demonstrable by this method, leaving 28 per cent of the group, or 12 cases, in which no obstruction could be demonstrated.

Through the studies reported in this paper it has been shown that a functional factor exists which may reasonably explain the absence of organic obstruction in some cases. Experiments will be outlined which have approached . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MINNEAPOLIS

From the Department of Surgery, University Hospitals.


Footnotes

Partially supported by a grant for technical assistance from the Work Projects Administration, Official Project 165-1-71-124, Subproject 399.

A condensation of a thesis submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Surgery.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1941 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.