You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 5, November 1942 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

SODIUM SALTS OF THE SULFONAMIDE COMPOUNDS

A STUDY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THEIR LOCAL USE IN WOUNDS

CHARLES L. FOX, Jr., M.D.

Arch Surg. 1942;45(5):754-763.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At present sulfanilamide is the accepted sulfonamide compound for local use in war wounds, compound fractures and the peritoneum.1 Experiments in vitro, however, have clearly shown that sulfadiazine (2-[paraaminobenzenesulfonamido]-pyrimidine) and sulfathiazole (2-[paraaminobenzenesulfonamido]-thiazole) are more potent antibacterial agents than sulfanilamide and are also far more resistant to drug inhibitors, such as paraaminobenzoic acid.2 Actually, against Escherichia coli (frequently a participant in peritonitis following intra-abdominal wounds) 1 mg. of sulfathiazole or sulfadiazine can accomplish as much as 430 mg. of sulfanilamide. To obtain bacteriostasis, furthermore, in the presence of 1 mg. per hundred cubic centimeters of paraaminobenzoic acid (or similar inhibitor of drug action) 15 mg. per hundred cubic centimeters of sulfadiazine or sulfathiazole is required, whereas 6,280 mg. per hundred cubic centimeters of sulfanilamide is necessary! Clinical experience has also demonstrated the superiority of these newer drugs over sulfanilamide and sulfapyridine (2-[paraaminobenzenesulfonamido]-pyridine).3 Nevertheless, these drugs have not supplanted . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

From the Department of Bacteriology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.


Footnotes

The drugs used in this study were provided by the Lederle Laboratories, Inc.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1942 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.