You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 5, May 1944 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ADMINISTRATION OF SUCCINYLSULFATHIAZOLE BEFORE AND AFTER HEMORRHOIDECTOMY

LIEUTENANT LEO L. LEVERIDGE

Arch Surg. 1944;48(5):366-371.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Hemorrhoidectomy is an elective operative procedure, traditionally performed in a contaminated field. The presence of large numbers of potentially pathogenic bacteria in this operative site, and flowing over the healing wounds postoperatively, has always had to be accepted as unavoidable. With recent developments of chemotherapy, means appear now within reach to alter these conditions.

Two drugs, sulfanilylguanidine and succinylsulfathiazole,1 have been reported to decrease the bacterial flora in the gastrointestinal tract, apparently without excessive systemic absorption. The newer drug, succinylsulfathiazole,2 appears to be less toxic and yet to be as effective as sulfanilylguanidine, with the additional advantage of being effectual in the presence of ulcerating lesions of the bowel.3

CHEMISTRY OF SUCCINYLSULFATHIAZOLE

Structurally, succinylsulfathiazole is a succinic acid derivative of sulfathiazole. It is relatively strongly acid in reaction. Its solubility in water is low, 0.070 Gm. dissolving in 100 cc. of water at 37 C. However, the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MEDICAL CORPS, ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES


Footnotes

This study was made possible by the cooperation of the following officers of the Medical Corps of the Army of the United States on the staff of the Station Hospital, Camp Blanding, Fla.: Major J. V. Freeman, Chief of the Surgical Service; Major J. E. Ryan, Chief of Septic Surgery, and Major J. T. Cuttino, Chief of the Laboratory Service. The problem was suggested by Major J. W. Annis, Chief of the Gastrointestinal Section of the Medical Service, and the work could not have been done without the assistance of Major A. Fodor, Sanitary Corps, Army of the United States. Assistant to the Chief of the Laboratory Service.

Dr. E. J. Poth, Galveston, Tex., and Dr. E. L. Burbidge, Sharp and Dohme, Philadelphia, made many helpful suggestions.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1944 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.