You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 6, June 1945 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

REVIEW OF UROLOGIC SURGERY

ALBERT J. SCHOLL, M.D.; FRANK HINMAN, M.D.; ALEXANDER von LICHTENBERG, M.D.; ALEXANDER B. HEPLER, M.D.; ROBERT GUTIERREZ, M.D.; COMMANDER GERSHOM J. THOMPSON, MC; EDWARD N. COOK, M.D.; EGON WILDBOLZ, M.D.; VINCENT J. O'CONOR, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1945;50(6):309-334.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

KIDNEY

Anomalies.

—Culp1 observed 6 instances of renal ectopia in a series of 747 cases in which pyelography was performed. In 3 of the 6 cases the patients had simple unilateral ectopia. According to Culp the anomaly was on the left side in 70 per cent of the cases previously reported. In 2 of the cases reported by Culp it was on the right side. The most common site for simple renal ectopia is the true pelvis, but in none of Culp's cases was the ectopic kidney situated in this region. Secondary disease was present in only 1 of the 3 cases of simple unilateral ectopia, but in all 3 there were symptoms referable to a kidney. In 2 cases there was crossed ectopia with fusion. This anomaly usually is found on the right side, but in both of Culp's cases of fused kidney the anomaly was situated . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO; MÉXICO, D. F., MEXICO; SEATTLE; NEW YORK; U.S.N.R.; ROCHESTER, MINN.; BERNE, SWITZERLAND; CHICAGO


Footnotes

This article has been released for publication by the Division of Publications of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery of the United States Navy. The opinions and views set forth in this article are those of the writers and are not to be considered as reflecting the policies of the Navy Department.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1945 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.