 |
 |

REVIEW OF UROLOGIC SURGERY
ALBERT J. SCHOLL, M.D.;
FRANK HINMAN, M.D.;
ALEXANDER B. HEPLER, M.D.;
ROBERT GUTIERREZ, M.D.;
GERSHOM J. THOMPSON, M.D.;
EDWARD N. COOK, M.D.;
VINCENT J. O'CONOR, M.D.
Arch Surg. 1946;53(2):214-246.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
KIDNEY
Stone.
—Boyd1 states that in operations for stones in the kidney one of the important duties of the surgeon is prevention of recurrence of stones by removal of all existing causes of formation of stones and by employment of an operative technic in which damage to the renal substance is limited to that which is absolutely necessary. It is necessary for the surgeon to have (1) a knowledge of the normal circulation in the kidney and of the variations which are by no means infrequent and (2) to know the conditions which are generally accepted as being the cause of or predisposing to the formation of stones. Briefly, these can be placed under four headings: (1) precipitation of urinary salts in the calices and pelves, (2) lack of free drainage from the kidney, or so-called urinary stasis, (3) injury to the mucous lining of the calices and pelves
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO; SEATTLE; NEW YORK; ROCHESTER, MINN.; CHICAGO
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|