You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 56 No. 4, April 1948 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

RECOVERY OF SENSATION IN SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFTS

A Study of One Hundred and Eighty-Seven Cases

GRAHAM A. KERNWEIN, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1948;56(4):459-474.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A REVIEW of the medical literature reveals few reports of studies concerning the recovery of sensation in skin grafts. All agree that, under favorable conditions of growth recovery of sensation in pedicle skin grafts begins at the periphery in the region of the proximal nerve supply and spreads distally. There is a temporal dissociation in the appearance of recovery. Pain sensation appears in three to six months and usually goes on to completion within a year. Touch returns in nine to twelve months, and temperature discrimination lags behind. Adequate recovery of sensation in a pedicle graft usually is followed by recovery of sympathetic innervation.

Review of the reports of studies dealing with recovery of sensation in split thickness skin grafts reveals that there are two opinions, diametrically opposed. Prior to McCarrol's1 report, recovery of sensation in split thickness grafts is described as patchy and incomplete and the rate of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MINOT, N. D.


Footnotes

Read at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, Feb. 22, 1947.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1948 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.