You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 60 No. 1, January 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

SECRETORY STUDIES ON THE ISOLATED STOMACH

LESTER R. DRAGSTEDT, M.D.; EDWARD R. WOODWARD, M.D.; WILLIAM B. NEAL, Jr., M.D.; PAUL V. HARPER, Jr., M.D.; EDWARD H. STORER, M.D.

Arch Surg. 1950;60(1):1-20.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ONE OF the obstacles encountered in a study of the physiology of gastric secretion is the difficulty of subjecting the normal stomach to the physiologic stimulus of food and making a quantitative collection of the gastric secretory output. In an attempt to simplify and control the many factors present, recourse has been made to various types of gastric pouches, fistulas and other preparations made with aseptic precautions in anesthetized animals. In most cases these preparations have proved compatible with survival in good health and with relative freedom from discomfort. Our present understanding of the mechanism of gastric secretion is largely dependent on these facts. Beaumont was the real pioneer in recognizing and utilizing surgical intervention as a method for the study of gastric physiology. The gastric fistula method in man used by him was subsequently employed with great advantage by Carlson1 and, more recently, by Wolf and Wolff.2 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

CHICAGO

From the Department of Surgery of the University of Chicago.


Footnotes

This work has been aided by grants from the Committee on Research and Fellowships of the United States Public Health Service, from the Otho S. A. Sprague Memorial Institute and from the Douglas Smith Foundation for Medical Research of the University of Chicago.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.