You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 2, February 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES OF VAGOTOMIZED PATIENTS

A Study of Three Hundred and Thirty-One Patients

WALTMAN WALTERS, M.D.; HIRAM H. BELDING, III, M.D.; WALTER I. LILLIE, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1951;62(2):183-205.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE REINTRODUCTION of gastric vagotomy in the treatment of duodenal, gastric and gastrojejunal ulceration by Dragstedt1 in 1946 has stimulated a wide interest in this operation. Previous reports by one of us2 have always advocated a reservation of opinion regarding postoperative clinical results because of the relatively short follow-up period. However, we now consider that follow-up studies from one to four years after operation have been carried out on a sufficient number of the 331 patients who have undergone gastric vagotomy at the Mayo Clinic so that some opinions can be formulated as to the comparative clinical value of gastric vagotomy in the treatment of the various types of peptic ulceration. In addition, the long term effects of gastric vagotomy on gastric acidity and motility and the results of insulin tests and their value as prognostic indexes of clinical results can be evaluated.

Our study is based on . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.

From the Division of Surgery, Mayo Clinic (Dr. Walters) and Mayo Foundation (Drs. Belding and Lillie, Fellows in Surgery).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.